Skip to content

🛡️ Sentinel: Fix insecure backup permissions#42

Open
kidchenko wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sentinel/secure-backups-3768380392851558610
Open

🛡️ Sentinel: Fix insecure backup permissions#42
kidchenko wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sentinel/secure-backups-3768380392851558610

Conversation

@kidchenko
Copy link
Owner

@kidchenko kidchenko commented Feb 26, 2026

🚨 Severity: HIGH
💡 Vulnerability: Backup archives and logs were created with default umask permissions (often 644/755), allowing other users on the system to read potentially sensitive project code and logs.
🎯 Impact: Information disclosure of private repositories, API keys in code, and remote URLs.
🔧 Fix: Enforced chmod 700 on backup/log directories and umask 077 during zip creation.
✅ Verification: Verified that new backup files are created with -rw------- and directories with drwx------.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 3768380392851558610 started by @kidchenko

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Security Fixes

    • Enhanced backup script with more restrictive permissions for temporary and log directories
    • Backup archives now created with stricter default file permissions
  • Documentation

    • Added security documentation detailing backup permissions protection and prevention measures

- Set chmod 700 on backup and log directories
- Use umask 077 when creating zip archives to ensure they are only readable by owner

Co-authored-by: kidchenko <5432753+kidchenko@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 26, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds security documentation for a backup permissions vulnerability and implements fixes in the backup script by restricting directory permissions to mode 700 and applying umask 077 during archival operations to prevent overly permissive file creation.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Security Documentation and Implementation
.jules/sentinel.md, tools/backup-projects.sh
New vulnerability documentation and corresponding security fixes: directories created with restricted 700 permissions, archival operations restricted with umask 077 for tighter default file permissions.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Poem

🐰 A backup made secure, with perms held tight,
Umask and chmod keep files out of sight,
No wandering eyes through directories deep,
Our precious archives safe, secrets to keep!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title directly addresses the main security fix of restricting backup file permissions to prevent unauthorized access, matching the core objective of the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings (stacked PR)
  • 📝 Generate docstrings (commit on current branch)
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch sentinel/secure-backups-3768380392851558610

Tip

Try Coding Plans. Let us write the prompt for your AI agent so you can ship faster (with fewer bugs).
Share your feedback on Discord.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
tools/backup-projects.sh (1)

352-360: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

TOCTOU race: directory briefly has default permissions between mkdir and chmod.

The current approach creates the directory with default umask permissions, then restricts them. An attacker with local access could theoretically read or traverse the directory during that brief window. Use mkdir -m 700 to create with correct permissions atomically.

🛡️ Proposed fix
     # Setup directories
     if [[ "$DRY_RUN" != true ]]; then
-        mkdir -p "$BACKUP_TEMP_DIR"
-        chmod 700 "$BACKUP_TEMP_DIR"
-        mkdir -p "$LOG_DIR"
-        chmod 700 "$LOG_DIR"
+        mkdir -p -m 700 "$BACKUP_TEMP_DIR"
+        mkdir -p -m 700 "$LOG_DIR"
     else
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@tools/backup-projects.sh` around lines 352 - 360, Replace the two-step
create+chmod sequence with an atomic create using mkdir -m 700 for both
BACKUP_TEMP_DIR and LOG_DIR when DRY_RUN is not true; keep the existing debug
messages for the dry-run branch. Specifically, in the block that checks DRY_RUN,
call mkdir -p -m 700 "$BACKUP_TEMP_DIR" and mkdir -p -m 700 "$LOG_DIR" (instead
of mkdir then chmod) so the directories are created with correct permissions
immediately.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In @.jules/sentinel.md:
- Around line 1-4: Change the heading in .jules/sentinel.md from "## 2026-02-26
- Insecure Backup Permissions" to a top-level heading using a single "#" and add
a blank line after it; then wrap or reflow the longer lines describing the
vulnerability, learning, and prevention so each line is <=80 characters
(preserve mentions of tools/backup-projects.sh, umask 077, and chmod 700),
keeping the same content and bullet structure to satisfy the markdown linter.

---

Outside diff comments:
In `@tools/backup-projects.sh`:
- Around line 352-360: Replace the two-step create+chmod sequence with an atomic
create using mkdir -m 700 for both BACKUP_TEMP_DIR and LOG_DIR when DRY_RUN is
not true; keep the existing debug messages for the dry-run branch. Specifically,
in the block that checks DRY_RUN, call mkdir -p -m 700 "$BACKUP_TEMP_DIR" and
mkdir -p -m 700 "$LOG_DIR" (instead of mkdir then chmod) so the directories are
created with correct permissions immediately.

ℹ️ Review info

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cb5949a and f73e44d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .jules/sentinel.md
  • tools/backup-projects.sh

Comment on lines +1 to +4
## 2026-02-26 - Insecure Backup Permissions
**Vulnerability:** The backup script `tools/backup-projects.sh` created project archives and log files with default umask permissions (often 644/755), making them readable by other users on the system.
**Learning:** Shell scripts creating sensitive archives often default to system umask, which is usually designed for collaboration, not secrecy.
**Prevention:** Explicitly set `umask 077` in a subshell before running archival commands like `zip` or `tar`, and use `chmod 700` on sensitive directories immediately after creation.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Fix markdown linting errors flagged by CI.

The documentation content is accurate, but static analysis reports formatting issues:

  • Line 1 should be a top-level heading (#) with a blank line below
  • Lines 2-4 exceed the 80-character limit
🔧 Proposed fix
-## 2026-02-26 - Insecure Backup Permissions
-**Vulnerability:** The backup script `tools/backup-projects.sh` created project archives and log files with default umask permissions (often 644/755), making them readable by other users on the system.
-**Learning:** Shell scripts creating sensitive archives often default to system umask, which is usually designed for collaboration, not secrecy.
-**Prevention:** Explicitly set `umask 077` in a subshell before running archival commands like `zip` or `tar`, and use `chmod 700` on sensitive directories immediately after creation.
+# Sentinel Security Findings
+
+## 2026-02-26 - Insecure Backup Permissions
+
+**Vulnerability:** The backup script `tools/backup-projects.sh` created project
+archives and log files with default umask permissions (often 644/755), making
+them readable by other users on the system.
+
+**Learning:** Shell scripts creating sensitive archives often default to system
+umask, which is usually designed for collaboration, not secrecy.
+
+**Prevention:** Explicitly set `umask 077` in a subshell before running
+archival commands like `zip` or `tar`, and use `chmod 700` on sensitive
+directories immediately after creation.
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
## 2026-02-26 - Insecure Backup Permissions
**Vulnerability:** The backup script `tools/backup-projects.sh` created project archives and log files with default umask permissions (often 644/755), making them readable by other users on the system.
**Learning:** Shell scripts creating sensitive archives often default to system umask, which is usually designed for collaboration, not secrecy.
**Prevention:** Explicitly set `umask 077` in a subshell before running archival commands like `zip` or `tar`, and use `chmod 700` on sensitive directories immediately after creation.
# Sentinel Security Findings
## 2026-02-26 - Insecure Backup Permissions
**Vulnerability:** The backup script `tools/backup-projects.sh` created project
archives and log files with default umask permissions (often 644/755), making
them readable by other users on the system.
**Learning:** Shell scripts creating sensitive archives often default to system
umask, which is usually designed for collaboration, not secrecy.
**Prevention:** Explicitly set `umask 077` in a subshell before running
archival commands like `zip` or `tar`, and use `chmod 700` on sensitive
directories immediately after creation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Lint Documentation

[failure] 4-4: Line length
.jules/sentinel.md:4:81 MD013/line-length Line length [Expected: 80; Actual: 183] https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.34.0/doc/md013.md


[failure] 3-3: Line length
.jules/sentinel.md:3:81 MD013/line-length Line length [Expected: 80; Actual: 144] https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.34.0/doc/md013.md


[failure] 2-2: Line length
.jules/sentinel.md:2:81 MD013/line-length Line length [Expected: 80; Actual: 201] https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.34.0/doc/md013.md


[failure] 1-1: First line in a file should be a top-level heading
.jules/sentinel.md:1 MD041/first-line-heading/first-line-h1 First line in a file should be a top-level heading [Context: "## 2026-02-26 - Insecure Backu..."] https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.34.0/doc/md041.md


[failure] 1-1: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
.jules/sentinel.md:1 MD022/blanks-around-headings Headings should be surrounded by blank lines [Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below] [Context: "## 2026-02-26 - Insecure Backup Permissions"] https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint/blob/v0.34.0/doc/md022.md

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In @.jules/sentinel.md around lines 1 - 4, Change the heading in
.jules/sentinel.md from "## 2026-02-26 - Insecure Backup Permissions" to a
top-level heading using a single "#" and add a blank line after it; then wrap or
reflow the longer lines describing the vulnerability, learning, and prevention
so each line is <=80 characters (preserve mentions of tools/backup-projects.sh,
umask 077, and chmod 700), keeping the same content and bullet structure to
satisfy the markdown linter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant